DESPISE DESPOTISM OR DESPITE THE DESPOTISM?
In the ravages of war and elections worldwide, attention
on characteristic leaders, liberals, autocrats, despots etc. is amplified. Thus,
an article of on autocracy cannot be timelier. Constructed from a Greek word,
Autocracy is resting of absolute power in oneself. Historically, the power in itself
was not questioned as autocrats/despots propagandized historical claims and appealed
to ethical/national victimhood. This rhetoric led to divisive politics with
resentment as its means, thus legitimizing Hitler, Mussolini’s rise to power.
However, fingers were pointed when the rise of
autarkic traditions and backsliding of democracy was coupled with violence. The
waning moral clarity redeemed in short time due to two reasons; firstly, the
emergence of newly independent countries who won independence through popular
struggle, thus paving democracy to be the obvious choice of the new State. Secondly,
internationalism led to the birth of the United Nations, a forum to co-operate
and confront opinions peacefully.
Decades have passed and no world war post 1945 is a
seminal example of popular legitimacy in hold of the world order. Yet, this is
not completely true. Robert Dahl observed “in much of the world the conditions most favorable to the development
and maintenance of democracy are nonexistent or at best only weakly present”,
indicating the unstableness of democracy. In today’s world, prima-facie liberal
world order coupled with economy co-operation masks the deeply rooted autocratic
regimes in countries. The Western media cites examples of the Rwandan President
Paul Kagame or the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban as tyrants. The Human
Rights Watch in 2014, documented cases of attacks and threats on critics of
Kagame rule. In 2022, European
Parliament called out Hungarian Government stating “Hungary can no longer be
considered a full democracy” shifting to become a State with electoral
autocracy. Fascinating as it is, the rule of these leaders is wielded with an
iron grip. While the Hungarian Prime Minister has had an uninterrupted 14 year
rule, the Rwandan President is back in power with 99% votes.
The question now arises. What is it that the
alleged despots deliver to the population for them to gravitate to anti-democratic
policies? It is the economic largesse
and developments at the cost of unrepresentative polity. World Health Organization
commended Kagame in 2020 for his efforts in building community based healthcare.
World Bank also noted the growth of Rwanda’s economy by 7.6% in 2023. Viktor Orban’s incentive on ensuring national
population is not outnumbered by immigrants and his Orbanomics (economic
policies) has made headlines.
Popular legitimacy varies with time and space and
the increasing number of countries led by alleged despots depicts the
population’s preference from despising the despots to preferring headstrong and determinate policies despite
them being despotic. The key to ensuring human rights do not take the brunt of
this is to reignite the role of civil society in advocating for balancing the rights
of all.
Comments
Post a Comment