DESPISE DESPOTISM OR DESPITE THE DESPOTISM?

In the ravages of war and elections worldwide, attention on characteristic leaders, liberals, autocrats, despots etc. is amplified. Thus, an article of on autocracy cannot be timelier. Constructed from a Greek word, Autocracy is resting of absolute power in oneself. Historically, the power in itself was not questioned as autocrats/despots propagandized historical claims and appealed to ethical/national victimhood. This rhetoric led to divisive politics with resentment as its means, thus legitimizing Hitler, Mussolini’s rise to power.

However, fingers were pointed when the rise of autarkic traditions and backsliding of democracy was coupled with violence. The waning moral clarity redeemed in short time due to two reasons; firstly, the emergence of newly independent countries who won independence through popular struggle, thus paving democracy to be the obvious choice of the new State. Secondly, internationalism led to the birth of the United Nations, a forum to co-operate and confront opinions peacefully.

Decades have passed and no world war post 1945 is a seminal example of popular legitimacy in hold of the world order. Yet, this is not completely true.  Robert Dahl observed “in much of the world the conditions most favorable to the development and maintenance of democracy are nonexistent or at best only weakly present”, indicating the unstableness of democracy. In today’s world, prima-facie liberal world order coupled with economy co-operation masks the deeply rooted autocratic regimes in countries. The Western media cites examples of the Rwandan President Paul Kagame or the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban as tyrants. The Human Rights Watch in 2014, documented cases of attacks and threats on critics of Kagame rule.  In 2022, European Parliament called out Hungarian Government stating “Hungary can no longer be considered a full democracy” shifting to become a State with electoral autocracy. Fascinating as it is, the rule of these leaders is wielded with an iron grip. While the Hungarian Prime Minister has had an uninterrupted 14 year rule, the Rwandan President is back in power with 99% votes.  

The question now arises. What is it that the alleged despots deliver to the population for them to gravitate to anti-democratic policies?  It is the economic largesse and developments at the cost of unrepresentative polity. World Health Organization commended Kagame in 2020 for his efforts in building community based healthcare. World Bank also noted the growth of Rwanda’s economy by 7.6% in 2023.  Viktor Orban’s incentive on ensuring national population is not outnumbered by immigrants and his Orbanomics (economic policies) has made headlines.

Popular legitimacy varies with time and space and the increasing number of countries led by alleged despots depicts the population’s preference from despising the despots to preferring   headstrong and determinate policies despite them being despotic. The key to ensuring human rights do not take the brunt of this is to reignite the role of civil society in advocating for balancing the rights of all.

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog